USELESS Foreign Sec HUMILIATES HIMSELF Trying to Defend Illegal Muslims in Britain!!!!-lynn

I don’t know about you, I have a massive problem when it comes to the security of this country. It would appear to me at least that our government, Labor at the moment and and previous governments before that always seem to be more concerned with things like international law, more concerned with what’s going on in other parts of the world, more concerned with the rules of uh other nations and not really giving two monkeys, let’s face it, about the the situation within our country, the security of our country and the safety

of our country. One of the massive issues we’ve got, and I mean a massive issue, is that of the boats, they continue to come unabated. And you know why? International law, treaties, and all that sort of thing. Now, to me, it’s a it’s a very simple case of you can stop them coming if you really wanted to.

And of course you could, but international law is in the way. Lots of things are in the way apparently and it doesn’t seem to be a priority. Hasn’t ever been a priority as far as I can see. And if I went down to Ramsgate or if I went down to do right now, I reckon I’d see that in action. There’s an exchange here from uh the House of uh House of Commons with uh Avette Cooper answering a question from the father of the house.

Let’s see how this goes. >> The House >> at the end of the foreign secretary’s statement. I’m no wiser as to whether the government approves this action and believes or does not believe that whether it breaks international law. Now the prime minister is such a devote of international law. He’s not prepared to def prime minister is such a devote of international law.

That very statement from uh the father of the house should tell you everything you want to know about the prime minister and uh his priorities international law be damned because international law in itself does do a lot of harm towards you know the good of this country. It just, you know, the mind boggles how we don’t do that.

Basically, >> defend our own borders from the small boats and take necessary action. >> Correct. >> We can’t defend our own borders from the small boats and take necessary action. We’ll come on to that in a little while. Now, what’s really telling is a vet Cooper’s uh response afterwards. Why is it that there’s one law for the American president doing what is right for his country and defending his country but a different law from us? So the simple question is does the government believe this breaks international law? Does it approve this

action? >> Very important point there. How how come it’s all right for the American president to take action to defend his country but we can’t seem to take action to defend ours? You see this point again and again, don’t you? I mean, one thing to point out where the uh milk has been soured in the relationship between us and the Americans, it’s very unfortunate because if you look at the history, if you look at the original English settlers that left here and went to there generations ago and took our English constitution with them,

which formed the basis of the American Constitution right in the early days. It would appear to me at least that we have far more in common with America than we do with Europe. So if they can defend their homeland, then why can’t we defend ours? Why why are we in a position where we are unable? We’re we’re like this basically. Let’s see what she answers.

That’s very interesting. Foreign Secretary. >> Well, I think as I said in my statement, as the prime minister said on Saturday, it is for the US to set out the legal position behind their actions. We were not involved in those actions. We continue to be guided by international law in our approach and we continue to work now for the most important issue to get transition to peaceful democracy in Venezuela.

So, no uh no acknowledgement of the comment about the boats whatsoever. And that is a a kind of non-answer which I I would expect from Iette Cooper. If you look at many of the interviews that she she’s displayed or been involved in in over a course of time, she’s a typical Fabian type Labor MP. Never answers a godamn thing and didn’t in that case and go on about international law.

Now, everyone went mad about what happened with Venezuela, but at the end of the day, on the southern border of the United States of America, you had an awful lot of uh material coming over which was doing harm to Americans. And I’m not only talking about the kind of stuff that you might uh put put up your left or right nostril.

I’m talking about administrative stuff as well. voting uh particulars, machines, and all that sort of stuff. The source was uh detected, determined, and the people responsible didn’t wind their neck in. So what you had or what you had playing out, the media uh basically uh made it look like Trump kidnapped the president of a foreign country, but that’s absolute What what you you were seeing in effect was an individual being indicted by a US judiciary and a warrant being enforced.

That’s what that was. they went and got him. So naturally it would follow that you know hopefully there will be a transition to some kind of peaceful democracy as Aette Cooper said but it is humiliating uh if if you roll it right back because at the end of the day he highlighted a very big problem there.

Our borders are not secure. Any acknowledgement of that anybody? No. And yet again they roll back on international law. International law or the interference of international law is responsible for a heck of a lot of damage within England. a heck of a lot of the rights that we can exercise as English to protect ourselves have been taken away from us or or inhibited because of international law and that’s all they seem to care about international law and it’s kind of humiliating that Iette Cooper stands there and asks on about other places

where our country is in enough trouble and at the end of the day and I’ve said it many times when people come into this country. I have questions. Who are you? Where have you come from? What do you want to do when you get here? Will you be bringing anybody with you? Can you financially support yourself? And a lot of the people that come over the channel are chucking their ID in the drink are here as a product of a a quite obvious and well doumented trafficking system and got no intention of peacefully integrating in in large

parts. In fact, there’s a a lot more to it. If you really look and you do the research online, you can see exactly what’s going on. And meanwhile, international law, international law, you know, years ago, there was a I think it was called the Port Act or or Entry Act or or uh illegal aliens act or something like that where those questions were asked, who are you? Where have you come from? What do you want to do when you get here? Blah blah blah blah blah.

And if there wasn’t a satisfactory answer to any of those questions, then the port of entry would refuse them entry and it would be the responsibility of the shipping company that bought them over to send them back. That law was abolished years ago. I wonder why. Maybe it needs bringing back. Let me know what you think in the comments.

As always, hit the like button, subscribe to the channel, share my stuff, and I will look forward to talking to you soon.