SCOTLAND AT BREAKING POINT: THE GREAT MIGRATION GASLIGHT! _heuh

And hello everybody. Welcome back to British Stand. Guys, today we’ve got a bit of a debate here um with regard to the upcoming sort of uh local elections in Scotland. We’ve got a Green Party MP, you know, absolute nutter and a reform uh candidate, so to speak, or I think a Green candidate, whatever, right? However, every single time this conversation comes up, they’re talking about immigration, right? And they’re talking about illegal immigration and they’re talking about legal migration.

But what I hate what the left do time and time again is put the two together, illegal immigration and legal immigration. So a reform candidate could be talking about illegal immigration, which is one thing, right? And then saying, “Yeah, but you can’t be saying that about migrants and stuff like that.

” They are two different freaking things. I am so sick of hearing and then left conflating the two every single time and saying, “Oh, you can’t be against migration. We need migration.” Yes, migration, legal migration, not illegal immigration. I honestly, it’s either the IQ is so freaking low, or they just do it purposely to push their agenda.

Anyway, listen to this green nutter actually gaslights and all this. We’re told to not like migration. We’re told not to do this. Honestly, these people are the worst. Let’s have a watch of it, guys. But first, please do the like button and hit the subscribe button for more. when it comes to immigration. >> So what Scotland needs is good quality skilled immigration, legal immigration and people who are coming here to make sure that they’re filling up the skills bases that we need.

What we don’t need is a mass illegal migration is happening currently in the country and that is what’s happening. There is evidence of it Laura I don’t I don’t I don’t want to get into an argu that that is an issue and it’s the top it’s the top third issue when it comes to polling in terms of how people will decide their vote in this election.

cost of living, NHS, immigration because people were feeling the pressure when it comes to immigration. So you ask me how many, there’s not a number. I don’t believe in giving numbers. I believe in trying to make sure that we get our population that is done right. I believe in scaling up our own young people. I believe in trying to make sure that young people stay in this country.

I want to make sure that taxes are lower so we don’t lose people so they’re not studying in our universities then leaving to go to other parts of the UK or further a field. I want to make sure that we have skilled immigration that comes here to fill the the job vacancies that exist.

We do not have this buckled down situation in Scotland where you can feel the country at breaking point where you can feel places. It might not be here in Ho but in places like Glasgow you can feel the city is at breaking point. We are now the asylum capital of the United Kingdom. It cannot sustain the way that it’s going.

Social cohesion is breaking down because of that. And I want to make sure that we tailor the system and rebalance it properly to make sure we have scaled immigration that comes to people but we deliver properly. Yes. But we try and clamp down on the illegal migration. >> So we know what you think about this because you’re the first party to be your manifesto.

Your manifesto says Scottish is a state of mind and a set of values which is generous, kind, amusing, hardworking, law-abiding, and fair-minded. How do you measure those things? >> Well, I just outlined it. You measure it by the people who come here. I can give you the example of where I come from in Glasgow.

We are a city that is proud to welcome anybody who comes into our country, who comes through the legal roots and who gives something back to the country. What we can’t do is we cannot have a situation where because of decisions in Hollywood when it came to the local connection rule for example in housing. Paul was the housing minister who removed the local connection rule which means that you don’t have to have a local connection to local authorities to be able to then get a house.

You then have an issue when refugees in particular granted leave to remain who will then come to places like Glasgow and throughout the whole country. It then creates a situation as well where Glasgow is a dispersal city. You haven’t we are now the asylum capital because so many people are coming. So it’s about the people who are coming.

I’m not saying I don’t want immigration. Glasgow, as I said, is a welcoming city. Scotland is a welcoming nation. We want people who are going to come here, who are going to contribute, who are going to help fill up those vacancies and help our economy. But we cannot be a country that continues to open up borders willy-nilly.

>> Laura, Laura Moody, you work in rural Dumpries and Galloway, another area suffering from depopulation with immigrants who’ve settled in the area. Does Scotland need more immigration or less? >> I mean, from my experience, more the the people that have migrated to my area, including myself, I have to say, you know, I’m probably tell from my accent.

I’m from Yorkshire. moved to rural Dumpries and Galloway. I’ve had four kids. I’m doing my bits to homegrow the population. But the reality is that the migrants in my community are huge contributors. They’re staffing in our local restaurants. They’re teaching in our local sto schools. They’re keeping our NHS from collapsing entirely, frankly, in a lot of rural areas.

So, we do need some migration. Um, and I think it should be about much more than just the economic case though. A few years ago, I was involved in setting up Dumpries and Galloway’s refugee charity, now known as the Depo, and that helped to settle Syrian migrants. It’s helped to settle Ukrainian migrants. Um, and and it’s there for anybody who is displaced in the community and needs a bit of support.

And it came out of a huge outpouring of support and love and concern from people about what they were seeing. >> So, Thomas Kris Thomas is wrong on this. >> Yes, he’s he is wrong. I think it means that >> he’s tried to tread a very careful line. But the reality is that if you’re standing for election, you’ve got to represent everybody in your community and you have a duty to attack division.

And you cannot represent everybody in your community if you’re telling some of them that they don’t belong. If you’re telling some of them that they shouldn’t be allowed to pray publicly a as a conservative MP did recently, we need to address that and we need to be there for everybody in our communities and we need to model the kind of thoughtful behavior that we expect to see from others.

>> We also need to be answering the questions that the public are asking us to raise. As I said, the top three issue that people will decide their vote on in this election is immigration. To simply turn around and say that it’s not an issue is just not feasible. >> Let’s see if it’s an issue. Let’s see if it’s an issue from people in this room.

Man, towards the back. Yeah, on you go. >> Yes, thank you. Um, I’m 45. I’ve lived in the UK for 18 years as what you call a legal immigrant based on my indefinite leave to remain status. I am married to a British citizen. I have two British kids. I own a house. Reform policy though suggests that I’m going to have to apply every 5 years um as somebody who’s already here legally to remain here.

Um, if I was to apply today, I can tell you now I don’t earn anywhere near enough to suggest, well, I’m not going to make up a number to tell me what you think I should make, but your policy says that I won’t earn enough to actually be considered an important member of society here. >> Okay. All right. Let let me We’re running out of time, but would that man should that man go on that basis? >> No.

And our Lian policy would not kick the man who has just spoke there because he’s settled here, he has kids here, he has worked here, he has contributed to our society. That is not what our policy is aimed to do. It’s to try it’s to try it’s to try and tackle the issue of the Boris wave in particular that came in where we was had loads of migrants that came in didn’t work.

>> You’ve been very clear on that. Rachel Hamilton the Boris wave. >> Okay. So I mean there’s there’s um more immigrants have entered the country under Labor. 68,000 um since uh March. Uh >> 2 million there’s 2 million came in under Boris Johnson. >> 168,000 have come. >> Yeah.

Well, listen abs I I I I actually hate the state of British politics here where you’ve got a uh member or someone from the Reform Party who’s talking about immigration is at the top of people’s sort of lists as concerns. However, I genuinely do believe I don’t know if people are just acting stupid, but when it comes to the term illegal immigration, key word there, illegal immigration and immigration, I hate how these two talking points get conflated.

There is a huge difference between illegal immigration and legal migration. And you’ve got this Green Party member saying, “Well, you’re going to be dividing communities.” Sorry, the illegal migrant doesn’t have the right to be in the local community in the first place. He didn’t come in legally. So, what’s she going on about? I hate this.

I It’s a rhetoric that I only hear from the left all the time. I hear it time and time again. I’ve lived abroad many, many times, right? Lived in different countries and whatnot. And they go, “Oh, it’s a bit rich from you to say, “Oh, you want to stop illegal immigration when you go off and and travel into different countries?” I’m like, “Sorry, it’s different when you go into a country legally for goodness sake.” I think the IQ is so low.

I don’t know if they do it tactically to try and tie in and make it all about against immigration, but these two talking points need to be separated. What reforms policies are mostly is tackling illegal migrants and the Green Party trying to gaslight there and saying, “Well, yeah, well, migrants are a great part of our society.

” Yes, but you’re arguing a complete different point. He’s talking about illegal migrants and asylum seekers. That is different. Can we stop coinciding the two together? Because they are two completely different talking points. It really freaking frustrates me. I absolutely hate it. And I don’t know if they just do it tactically or their IQ so freaking low.

They think they’re all about the same thing. They are completely two different talking points. For God’s sake, of course, a country is still going to allow le uh people to come in legally like anywhere else in the world. If you’re an asset or a pillar to the community, Yes. and you’re going to work, then yes, there’s always going to be a legal route for people to move to the country. Of course, there is.

However, that doesn’t mean you coincide that with illegal immigration. God goodness sake, it’s so frustrating to hear this every single time. People actually representing um their constituencies uh looking to try and get into positions of powers and conflate the two and buy them together. They are not the same.

For God’s sake, guys, let me know your thoughts on that down there in the comments. And as always, please do the like button. and hit the subscribe button for